The English Department funds all M.A./Ph.D.s who enter the program with a B.A. degree for six years. Ph.D. students who enter with an M.A. degree are funded for five years. See Timelines for more information.
- Plan of Study
- Language Requirement
- The Doctoral Examination
- Dissertation Prospectus
- Prospectus Colloquium
- Dissertation Chapter Advisory Conference
- Dissertation Defense
- Job Training and Professional Development
- Application to Receive the Degree
Requirements for the Doctoral degree should be completed in five years for Ph.D. students (those entering with an M.A.) and in six years for category M.A./Ph.D. students (those entering with only a B.A.). Students normally enroll in coursework for three years beyond the B.A. or two years beyond the external M.A. and then register to take examinations. Please see Timelines for the Ph.D. Time-to- Completion Plan recommended by the Director of Graduate Studies. At least one year (two consecutive semesters) of graduate work must be spent in full-time study (“residence”) at Storrs. Doctoral students normally fulfill this requirement while taking course work. Students must maintain continuous registration throughout the graduate program.
All Ph.D. students are assigned by the Director of Graduate Studies a Major Advisor from the Department of English upon matriculation. Associate Advisors may be members of any university department. Courses to be taken and all additional program policies should be discussed with the Major Advisor. Students may change Major or Associate advisors at any time (for example, when selecting an appropriate examination committee). Forms to change Advisory Committee members are available in the Graduate English Office and at the Grad School website.
MA/PhD students are required to complete 46 credits of course work at UCONN for the PhD; PhD students are ordinarily required to complete 24 credits of course work at UCONN for the Ph.D., and at least 45 credits total of graduate work. The usual course load for a full-time student in each semester is between six and nine credits (if the student is a teaching assistant), as approved by the Major Advisor. Coursework must fulfill the following requirements:
- English 5100
- English 5150 (MA/PhD only; one credit)
- English 5160
- one course in theory (literary, cultural, rhet/comp; English 5500, 6500 or another approved course)
- one course in literature in English before 1800
- one course in literature in English after 1800
Students who feel they have fulfilled any of the requirements listed above (at another institution) may petition the graduate program office to have those requirements waived at UCONN.
MA/PhD students who are continuing for the PhD have until the end of the third year of coursework to fulfill the distribution requirements.
Coursework is normally taken at Storrs. Transfer of up to six credits from another institution’s graduate program, or from non-degree graduate coursework undertaken at UCONN, may be accepted toward the MA or the PhD, provided that such credits are not used to earn a degree at another institution.
The Graduate Executive Committee recommends that students take no more than six credits of Independent Study. All Independent Studies must be approved by the Director of Graduate Studies. Finally, the Graduate Executive Committee strongly discourages incompletes. However, incompletes taken under extraordinary circumstances must be completed within one month of the appointed course final examination time; students who fail to complete coursework within this timeframe will be placed on probationary status by the Graduate Executive Committee. Students with more than one incomplete at any given time may be dropped from the program after review by the Committee.
All MA/PhD students must submit materials to the Second-Year Review Committee in the second year of study at UConn; the review will take place in the spring semester. Candidates will be evaluated according to five criteria: the completion of at least 30 credits of coursework by the end of the Review semester; the maintenance of a minimum 3.7 GPA; the persuasiveness of a 1,000-word (maximum) research statement, which references the candidate’s intellectual and professional development and future plans; the quality of a seminar paper that best demonstrates the abilities of its author; and written evaluations by the candidate’s current advisor as well as a faculty member with whom the candidate has worked in seminar. In preparing materials for the review committee, the candidate should consult closely with his / her advisor. In requesting letters from the faculty, the graduate program will ask for frank assessments of the strengths and weaknesses of the candidate, including but not limited to the candidate’s ability to write strong general examinations, undertake original scholarship in the dissertation, and to complete all requirements for the degree in a timely fashion. (The personal statement, writing sample, and evaluations by faculty members must be submitted to the graduate program office by February 1st).
The Review Committee’s assessment of the candidate will not be based disproportionately on any one element of the portfolio, but on the totality of the materials presented. The Review Committee will generate a written response to each candidate, the results of which will be conveyed in a meeting between the candidate and the Director of Graduate Studies. Candidates earning a “Pass” will receive an MA degree (upon completion of the final writing project) and move onto the next phase of PhD work. Students who earn a “Low Pass” will receive an MA degree (upon completion of the final writing project) but will not be invited to continue in the PhD program. Students who fail the Second-Year Review will be allowed to submit–by June 1st–a revised portfolio for reconsideration for the MA degree; students who fail a second time will not receive the degree. (For details concerning the final writing project, please see the degree requirements for the discrete MA, available here.)
The Plan of Study for the Ph.D. degree must be signed by all members of the Advisory Committee and submitted to the Graduate School (copy to the Graduate English Office) in the last semester of course work for the degree. The Graduate School requires 15 credits of the mandatory research course GRAD 6950. These credits can be fulfilled within two to three semesters of continuous registration with a full Teaching Assistantship. The Plan of Study must indicate which courses have been taken and are to be taken in fulfillment of requirements, how the language requirement has been or will be fulfilled, and what the dissertation topic will be. Any changes–in courses submitted, language requirement plans–must be submitted to the Graduate School on a “Request for Changes in Plan of Graduate Study” form. All forms are available in the English Graduate Office or online here.
The English Department requires its doctoral students to know at least one foreign language, preferably one of demonstrable utility in their intended area of specialization. Students specializing in certain areas–Medieval or Renaissance, for example–will probably need to acquire additional language skills. The various ways to demonstrate knowledge of a foreign language are described in detail in the current Graduate School Catalog: http://gradcatalog.uconn.edu/grad-school-info/standards-degree-requirements/#DocPhil. A plan to fulfill the language requirement should be worked out early in the student’s program in consultation with the Major Advisor. The Graduate Executive Committee recommends that students complete the requirement prior to completing coursework and requires that students do so prior to submission of the dissertation prospectus. Failure to complete the language requirement by the end of the third year (PhD students) or by the end of the fourth year (MA/PhD students) will put students at risk of losing their funding for the next academic year. Forms for the language requirement are online here; they must be completed and signed and then submitted to the Graduate School.
The DGS will meet with students at risk of losing their funding before determining whether funding will be continued or discontinued. Funding decisions will be made by the DGS in consultation with the Graduate Executive Committee, and will be communicated to students by the DGS.
The PhD Qualifying Examinations are based on two reading lists (details below), which are created in the final semester of coursework and must be approved by the Graduate Executive Committee. The Graduate Executive Committee recommends the following timeline for completion of the Doctoral Examination:
- In consultation with the Advisory Committee, create Exam lists in the spring semester of the final coursework year.
- Submit Exam lists and the Doctoral Examination Approval Form to the Graduate Office for approval by April 1.
- Submit Plan of Study to the Graduate School in summer or early fall semester in the third year.
- Take the Doctoral Examination no later than February 28th of the fourth year for M.A./Ph.D.s, or third year for Ph.D.s. The Graduate Executive Committee recommends that students take exams in the late Fall.
- Submit dissertation prospectus and schedule the Prospectus Colloquium no later than April 1st of the fourth year for M.A./Ph.D.s, or third year for M.A./Ph.D.s.
The PhD Qualifying Examinations are based on two reading lists, which provide the materials for three discrete exams: one addressing the first reading list, one addressing the second reading list, and a third which combines materials from both lists. For the purposes of the exams, each list designates a clearly defined and professionally recognizable field or subfield of scholarship (e.g., a literary-historical period such as the Renaissance, a transtemporal genre such as Drama, a critical tradition such as Feminism, an established body of literature such as Children’s Literature). Each of the two lists consists of approximately 60-75 works, including both “primary” and “secondary” works (approximately 75% primary works and approximately 25% secondary works). The relationship between the two reading lists is to be determined by the advisory committee, with the understanding that the fields identified by each list are to complement one another (in terms of (literary) history, discipline, method, genre, or otherwise).
The definition of a “primary” work is to be determined by the student in consultation with his/her Advisory Committee, as appropriate to the field in question. Generally speaking, excerpts are not permissible, though standard excerpts of exceedingly long or multi-volume works may be permitted with the approval of the Advisory Committee. (In assembling selections of poems, essays, excerpts, etc., students should not use undergraduate-oriented anthologies such as the Norton or Bedford anthologies; instead, students should research and choose an authoritative scholarly edition that surveys adequately–for a Ph.D.-level exam–each author’s writings.) A “secondary” work (which designates not only literary criticism but also historical and theoretical texts) can refer to a book, a long essay, or a group of short essays. The student’s reading lists should reflect both breadth and depth of reading, as well as a sense of the history of criticism throughout the fields and contemporary critical and theoretical approaches. There should be no overlap of works between the two reading lists. Selections of both primary and secondary works should take into consideration both coverage of the field and preparation for the anticipated dissertation.
The two exams test the student’s mastery of the designated fields for the purposes of both teaching and research. The third exam tests the student’s ability to combine material from both reading lists in the service of a comprehensive argument (ideally one informing future work on the dissertation).
Reading lists are to be drawn up by the student in consultation with his or her Advisory Committee, beginning at the end of the fall semester of the final year of coursework. Students are encouraged, though not required, to meet with the Advisory Committee as a whole to discuss the creation of the lists. All items in each list should be numbered clearly, and lists should be arranged chronologically or in some other systematic fashion.
Each list should be accompanied by a brief statement (no longer than 500 words), known as a “rationale,” which explains its content. The purpose of the rationales is the following: 1) to identify a body of literature and its legibility as part of a professionally recognizable field or subfield; 2) to justify inclusions or exclusions that might seem idiosyncratic or which are, at least, not self-explanatory (e.g., including more drama than prose or poetry on a Renaissance list); 3) to indicate a methodological, theoretical, or other type of emphasis (e.g,, a high number of gender studies-oriented secondary works).
The student is responsible for making copies of his/her lists and rationales and depositing them, along with the completed Examination Approval Form, in the Graduate English Office no later than April 1st of the final year of coursework. All reading lists will then be referred to the Graduate Executive Committee for approval. Students and Advisors should note that the Graduate Executive Committee will not approve lists that fail to meet the basic guidelines recommended above. Students whose ideas about the exams continue to change during the reading period may update their lists with the approval of their Advisory Committees.
After Examination lists are approved, students in consultation with their Advisory Committees need to agree upon specific dates on which their exam is to be administered and if the candidate requires a space on-campus, arrangements should be made at this time. The student needs to complete the Graduate Doctoral Examination Sign-up form, which is available in the Graduate English Office. The deadline by which all students must take their Examination (including the Conference) is February 28th of the fourth year for M.A./Ph.D.s, or 3rd year for Ph.D.s.
The Ph.D. Examination was devised in part to facilitate students’ timely completion of the doctoral degree, and so the Graduate Executive Committee requires that students meet all official deadlines. Students incapable of meeting an Examination deadline, for whatever reason, must apply for a time extension from the Graduate Director by submitting a typed request, signed by the student and his/her Major Advisor, at least one month in advance of the deadline. The letter must state the specific reasons for the time delay and also designate the specific amount of extra time requested. The Graduate Director, in consultation with the Graduate Executive Committee, will determine an appropriate response to the request, which will be communicated to the candidate by the Graduate Director. The Committee’s response will specify new deadlines by which the exam should be taken or the Prospectus Colloquium passed. Students repeatedly failing to show progress towards the degree will be required to meet with the Major Advisor and Graduate Director to determine an appropriate solution to the problem.
Examination questions are to be drafted by the candidate’s Committee and approved by the Director of Graduate Studies, but the Major Advisor is responsible for overseeing the exam. Candidates are not permitted to view the questions prior to the examination. The questions in the Examination are organized into three distinct sections:
The first tests the candidate’s knowledge of works on the first list. Candidates must answer one of two questions The second tests the candidate’s knowledge of works on the second list. Candidates must answer one of two questions. The third tests the candidate’s ability to synthesize material from both lists in the service of a single comprehensive argument. Candidates must answer one of two questions.
This open-book, take-home examination must be written over a 72-hour period, between the hours of 8 AM on day one, when the exam is distributed, and 8 AM on day 4, when the exam must be emailed to the major advisor and Graduate Program Assistant. The Graduate Executive Committee strongly recommends that all candidates consult their entire Advisory Committee about their personal understanding of the examination process and expectations for each part of it–both early in the process of studying the lists and at a later stage just prior to scheduling the examination. Committees and candidates may wish to establish recommendations or guidelines for how candidates will ideally approach the examination over the 72-hour test period. For example, candidates who feel they require more structure may ask their major advisor to collect each response at a designated time (e.g., essay 1 on the first evening, essay 2 on the second evening, and essay 3 on the final evening). The point of the take-home examination is NOT to suggest that candidates should be working non-stop or obsessively on an examination for the entire time; rather, the point is to allow candidates to demonstrate adequately their knowledge of a sizable body of material and to articulate this knowledge without feeling rushed. The Executive Committee assumes that each essay will be approximately 10-15 pages of double-spaced prose (with limited block quoting); that each essay will answer the question asked by the Advisory Committee, however creatively; that each essay will establish a clear argument and seek to back it up with textual evidence; and that each essay will be clearly written and appropriately revised. Pre-written essays are strictly forbidden.
Upon completion of the written examination, students will receive a grade from their committee of “Pass,” “Fail,” or “Honors.” Students who fail the examination will be required to meet with the Advisory Committee to determine an appropriate time and plan for retaking it. Students failing the examination twice will be dismissed from the program. Upon successful completion of the PhD General Exams, the student officially becomes a candidate for the Ph.D. degree (ABD), and should devote full time to completion of the dissertation. Please Note: ABD status grants a salary increase and eligibility for a library study carroll.
Applies only to candidates who have passed the examination; students will be notified of their grade prior to the meeting. Within two weeks of the written examination, The Dissertation Advisory Committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the Examination. The Examination Conference is a mandatory meeting of the student and the Advisory Committee, not a graded component of the examination. The purpose of the Conference is twofold: to offer candidates a forum wherein can occur a thorough discussion of their exam’s strengths and weaknesses, and to ease the transition from the examination phase to the prospectus phase of the Ph.D. To this end, the Executive Committee assumes that Advisory Committee members will divide time appropriately between offering feedback on each of the three essays and working collaboratively to establish a clear understanding of expectations, goals, deadlines for completion of the prospectus. The Examination Conference form needs to be signed by Advisory Committee and filed with the Graduate English Office.
The Dissertation Prospectus, which must contain an accurate title and concise account of the proposed dissertation, must be submitted to the Graduate School before the actual writing of the dissertation has begun. The school’s form can be found online at www.grad.uconn.edu. The prospectus should be approximately ten-pages long, excluding the bibliography. The Prospectus must be approved by the student’s Advisory Committee and reviewed by two departmental reviewers outside the committee, who are appointed by the Director of Graduate Studies.
The Dissertation Prospectus Colloquium is an opportunity for the student to defend the thesis topic before the Advisory Committee. The colloquium should take place before the actual writing begins on the dissertation. The Advisory Committee expects to be presented with a Prospectus sufficiently far along in its development for a judgment to be made on its scholarly validity and potential as a fully developed dissertation. The student and Major Advisor should inform the Director of Graduate Studies at least one month in advance of the day and time of this event. Departmental Representatives need at least two weeks notice before the actual colloquium to read the prospectus.
The Dissertation Chapter Advisory Conference is a non-graded opportunity for new ABD students to discuss with their advisory committees the strengths and weaknesses of a complete draft of a dissertation chapter. The conference is designed to serve three basic purposes: 1) to facilitate the transition of ABDs into the process of researching and writing the doctoral dissertation; 2) to encourage early communication between students and their committee members, and between primary and secondary advisors; 3) to encourage discussion of a future plan for the completion of the other dissertation chapters/parts. The Graduate Executive Committee requires every Ph.D. student to submit a complete draft of a chapter to the advisory committee, within 3 months but no later than 6 months after the date of the Dissertation Prospectus Defense. By “complete,” the Committee wishes to emphasize that the intellectual integrity of the submitted chapter must not be compromised by any omitted material (such as notes, bibliography, etc.), by significant stylistic weaknesses, grammatical errors, etc. After the Conference, students must turn into the Graduate office an Advisory Conference Approval Form, which must be signed by all advisory committee members.
A Dissertation Defense is required of every student by the Graduate School. The student’s Advisory Committee and 2 Departmental Representatives are required to attend; members of the department and the University community are invited to attend. The defense is both an examination and a forum for the candidate to comment on the scope and significance of the research. As a result of the Dissertation Defense, the student’s Advisory Committee may require revisions and corrections to the dissertation. The student initiates scheduling of the Defense by consulting first with members of the Advisory Committee and the Graduate Office. At least five members of the faculty (including the members of the student’s Advisory Committee) must participate. Only members of the Advisory Committee, however, may actually recommend passing or failing the student.
According to the graduate school catalog, the dissertation should represent a significant contribution to ongoing research in the candidate’s field. While the graduate school does not stipulate a minimum length for dissertations, the Graduate Executive Committee strongly suggests a minimum length of 60,000 words inclusive for a traditional dissertation in English (not a creative dissertation or a “born-digital” DH dissertation). The committee suggests this length as representing approximately 2/3 of the standard length of an academic monograph according to current publication practices.
Students must schedule the Dissertation Defense with the Graduate Office and Advisory Committee at least three months ahead of time. Complete, clean copies of the dissertation should be distributed at least three weeks prior to the defense: two copies to the Graduate Office for department representatives, one copy to the main English office (208), and copies to each Advisory Committee member. The student must also fulfill procedures set by the Graduate School at least four weeks before the planned defense, as well as notify the UCONN Events Calendar.
In the semester prior to submitting applications for a job, contact the Graduate Director to announce your intentions to go on the job market. The department runs annual meetings on CV and cover letter writing, teaching portfolio workshops, MLA and campus interviewing, etc. The Executive Committee recommends that Ph.D. students attend all of them.
An application to receive the Ph.D. degree must be filed in the Graduate Records Office. Check the current Graduate Bulletin for the deadline for submitting this application.